Insulting or showing contempt or lack of reverence for a religious deity or sacred person or thingBlasphemy is the act of insulting or showing contempt or lack of to a, or objects, or toward something considered sacred or.Some religions consider blasphemy to be a religious crime. As of 2012, anti-blasphemy laws existed in 32 countries, while 87 nations had hate speech laws that covered defamation of religion and public expression of hate against a religious group. Anti-blasphemy laws are particularly common in Muslim-majority nations, such as those in the Middle East and North Africa, although they are also present in some Asian and European countries. Contents.Etymology The word 'blasphemy' came via blasfemen and blasfemer and blasphemare from βλασφημέω, from βλάπτω 'injure' and φήμη 'utterance, talk, speech'. From blasphemare also came Old French blasmer, from which English ' came. Blasphemy: 'from Gk.
![]()
Definition of blasphemous adjective in Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary. Meaning, pronunciation, picture, example sentences, grammar, usage notes, synonyms and more. Define blasphemy. Blasphemy synonyms, blasphemy pronunciation, blasphemy translation, English dictionary definition of blasphemy. Blasphemies 1. Contemptuous or profane speech or action concerning God or a sacred entity. An instance of this. Irreverent or impious.
Blasphemia 'a speaking ill, impious speech, slander,' from blasphemein 'to speak evil of.' ' 'In the sense of speaking evil of God this word is found in Ps. 13:1, 6; 16:9, 11, 21. It denotes also any kind of calumny, or evil-speaking, or abuse (1 Kings 21:10; Acts 13:45; 18:6, etc.).' Blasphemy laws.
Main article:Blasphemy in is impious utterance or action concerning, or anything considered sacred in Islam. The admonishes blasphemy, but does not specify any worldly punishment for blasphemy. The, which are another source of, suggest various punishments for blasphemy, which may include. However, it has been argued that the death penalty applies only to cases where there is involved that may seriously harm the community, especially during times of war. Different traditional prescribe different punishment for blasphemy, depending on whether the blasphemer is Muslim or non-Muslim, a man or a woman. In the modern, the laws pertaining to blasphemy, and some countries prescribe punishments consisting of fines, imprisonment,. Blasphemy laws were rarely enforced in pre-modern Islamic societies, but in the modern era some states and radical groups have used charges of blasphemy in an effort to burnish their religious credentials and gain popular support at the expense of liberal Muslim intellectuals and religious minorities.
In recent years, accusations of blasphemy against Islam have sparked international controversies and played part in incidents of mob violence and assassinations of prominent figures.Judaism. Nathan confronts over his sex scandal with Bathsheba the wife of Uriah the Hittite, saying 'by this deed you have given occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme' (:14)In the punishment for blasphemy is death. In the only form of blasphemy which is punishable by death is blaspheming the.The, which Judaism sees as applicable to all people, prohibit blasphemy.In one of the texts of the, called the, violence against non-Jews (also called ) is prohibited, except in cases where it is sanctioned by a Jewish governing authority 'so that they will not blaspheme'. Sikhism According to the 1st (832/5/2708),He is a swine, a dog, a donkey, a cat, a beast, a filthy one, a mean man and a pariah (low caste), who turns his face away from the Guru.In the Guru Granth Sahib, Page 1381-70-71,Fareed: O faithless dog, this is not a good way of life. You never come to the mosque for your five daily prayers. Rise up, Fareed, and cleanse yourself; chant your morning prayer. The head which does not bow to the Lord - chop off and remove that head.In the Guru Granth Sahib, page 89–2,Chop off that head which does not bow to the Lord.
O Nanak, that human body, in which there is no pain of separation from the Lord-let that be to the flames.Further in the Guru Granth Sahib page 719,Even if someone slanders the Lord's humble servant, he does not give up his own goodness.It would be erroneous to deduce prescriptions for blasphemy in a strict canonical sense from the Guru Granth Sahib as it is written in of 2, 6, 8, 16 sections/parts called Padas, which are short compositions of two or more verses, and which are a rung of a ladder or steps and hence the essence behind must be constructed from the preceding and following verses. Blasphemy is considered as the submission to the vanity of the and especially excessive egoistical pride. The United Nations. Main article:In the early 21st century, blasphemy became an issue in the United Nations. The passed several resolutions which called upon the world to take action against the 'defamation of religions'.The campaign for worldwide criminal penalties for the 'defamation of religions' had been spearheaded by on behalf of the United Nations' large Muslim bloc. The campaign ended in 2011 when the proposal was withdrawn in Geneva, in the Human Rights Council because of lack of support, marking an end to the effort to establish worldwide blasphemy strictures along the lines of those in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Iran.
This resolution had passed every year since 1999, in the United Nations, with declining number of 'yes' votes with each successive year.In July, 2011, the released a 52-paragraph statement, General Comment 34 on the (ICCPR) 1976, concerning freedoms of opinion and expression. Paragraph 48 states:Prohibitions of displays of lack of respect for a religion or other belief system, including blasphemy laws, are incompatible with the Covenant, except in the specific circumstances envisaged in article 20, paragraph 2, of the Covenant. Such prohibitions must also comply with the strict requirements of article 19, paragraph 3, as well as such articles as 2, 5, 17, 18 and 26. Thus, for instance, it would be impermissible for any such laws to discriminate in favor of or against one or certain religions or belief systems, or their adherents over another, or religious believers over non-believers. Nor would it be permissible for such prohibitions to be used to prevent or punish criticism of religious leaders or commentary on religious doctrine and tenets of faith. Colloquial usage In contemporary language, the notion of blasphemy is often used.
This usage has garnered some interest among linguists recently, and the word 'blasphemy' is a common case used for illustrative purposes. Blasphemy Day International encourages individuals and groups to openly express. It was founded in 2009 by the. A student contacted the Center for Inquiry in, to present the idea, which CFI then supported.
Ronald Lindsay, president and CEO of the Center for Inquiry, said, regarding Blasphemy Day, 'We think religious beliefs should be subject to examination and criticism just as political beliefs are, but we have a taboo on religion', in an interview with.Events worldwide on the first annual Blasphemy Day in 2009 included an art exhibit in and a festival in. See also.References.
![]() Answer: The concept of “blasphemy against the Spirit” is mentioned in Mark 3:22–30 and Matthew 12:22–32. Jesus has just performed a miracle. A demon-possessed man was brought to Jesus, and the Lord cast the demon out, healing the man of blindness and muteness. The eyewitnesses to this exorcism began to wonder if Jesus was indeed the Messiah they had been waiting for. A group of Pharisees, hearing the talk of the Messiah, quickly quashed any budding faith in the crowd: “It is only by Beelzebul, the prince of demons, that this fellow drives out demons,” they said (Matthew 12:24). Jesus rebuts the Pharisees with some logical arguments for why He is not casting out demons in the power of Satan (Matthew 12:25–29). Then He speaks of the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit: “I tell you, every kind of sin and slander can be forgiven, but blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come” (verses 31–32). The term blasphemy may be generally defined as “defiant irreverence.” The term can be applied to such sins as cursing God or willfully degrading things relating to God. Blasphemy is also attributing some evil to God or denying Him some good that we should attribute to Him. This particular case of blasphemy, however, is called “the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit” in Matthew 12:31. The Pharisees, having witnessed irrefutable proof that Jesus was working miracles in the power of the Holy Spirit, claimed instead that the Lord was possessed by a demon (Matthew 12:24). Notice in Mark 3:30 Jesus is very specific about what the Pharisees did to commit blasphemy against the Holy Spirit: “He said this because they were saying, ‘He has an impure spirit.’” Blasphemy against the Holy Spirit has to do with accusing Jesus Christ of being demon-possessed instead of Spirit-filled. This particular type of blasphemy cannot be duplicated today. The Pharisees were in a unique moment in history: they had the Law and the Prophets, they had the Holy Spirit stirring their hearts, they had the Son of God Himself standing right in front of them, and they saw with their own eyes the miracles He did. Never before in the history of the world (and never since) had so much divine light been granted to men; if anyone should have recognized Jesus for who He was, it was the Pharisees. Yet they chose defiance. They purposely attributed the work of the Spirit to the devil, even though they knew the truth and had the proof. Jesus declared their willful blindness to be unpardonable. Their blasphemy against the Holy Spirit was their final rejection of God’s grace. They had set their course, and God was going to let them sail into perdition unhindered. Jesus told the crowd that the Pharisees’ blasphemy against the Holy Spirit “will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come” (Matthew 12:32). This is another way of saying that their sin would never be forgiven, ever. Not now, not in eternity. As Mark 3:29 puts it, “They are guilty of an eternal sin.” The immediate result of the Pharisees’ public rejection of Christ (and God’s rejection of them) is seen in the next chapter. Jesus, for the first time, “told them many things in parables” (Matthew 13:3; cf. Mark 4:2). The disciples were puzzled at Jesus’ change of teaching method, and Jesus explained His use of parables: “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. . . . Though seeing, they do not see; though hearing, they do not hear or understand” (Matthew 13:11, 13). Jesus began to veil the truth with parables and metaphors as a direct result of the Jewish leaders’ official denunciation of Him. Again, the blasphemy of the Holy Spirit cannot be repeated today, although some people try. Jesus Christ is not on earth—He is seated at the right hand of God. No one can personally witness Jesus performing a miracle and then attribute that power to Satan instead of the Spirit. The unpardonable sin today is the state of continued unbelief. The Spirit currently convicts the unsaved world of sin, righteousness, and judgment (John 16:8). To resist that conviction and willfully remain unrepentant is to “blaspheme” the Spirit. There is no pardon, either in this age or in the age to come, for a person who rejects the Spirit’s promptings to trust in Jesus Christ and then dies in unbelief. The love of God is evident: “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life” (John 3:16). And the choice is clear: “Whoever believes in the Son has eternal life, but whoever rejects the Son will not see life, for God’s wrath remains on him” (John 3:36). ![]() Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
March 2023
Categories |